14.1
Modern
desktop mapping systems and desktop GIS, have the façade of being easy to use
applications that enable professionals to visualise and analyse spatial relationships in
their data at will. While this is the case in situations where there is a dedicated
structure to manage spatial data and users are appropriately trained, in practice the
apparent ease of use of these applications often leads to poor spatial data management
practices. In some instances it also leads to a dangerous misuse of that spatial data,
sometimes with tragic consequences.
14.2
As
has been demonstrated in this report, error and uncertainty are inherent in spatial data.
Spatial data managers need to understand the factors that place limitations on the
positional accuracy of their spatial data in order to guide their users to the appropriate
uses of that data.
14.3
Effective
spatial data management to minimise the effects of error and uncertainty requires several
factors to be implemented. These are:
14.3.1
Culture
Foster and nurture the development of a culture within
their organisation that encourages and rewards competence, conscientiousness and assuming
ownership for spatial data, while taking action to stamp out the undesirable human factors
that affect the quality of spatial data.
14.3.2
Procedures
Develop, monitor and enhance appropriate procedures to
ensure that data is captured, managed and utilised appropriately and that work is
performed consistently.
14.3.3
Quality
Assurance Implement appropriate quality assurance
procedures to monitor and check that work is performed to the desired standard and that
spatial data captured or manipulated is of a suitable quality.
14.3.4
Metadata
Implement the appropriate level of Metadata to adequately
describe either a complete spatial theme or ideally each individual spatial entity.